|
Metal Genres
Death Metal
Black Metal
Grindcore
Thrash
Speed Metal
Heavy Metal
Metal Music
Heavy Metal F.A.Q.
Interviews
Philosophy
Metal Concerts
Heavy Metal CDs
Heavy Metal MP3s
Metal Media
Articles
Heavy Metal Zines
Heavy Metal Video
Heavy Metal Books
Metal Links
Metal Community
About
Contact
Metal Forum
Letters
Mailing List
|
Kaiser Kuo is a Chinese metal pioneer (Tang Dynasty and Chunqiu), blogger and columnist, who currently lives in Beijing. Having grown up in the United States, he was kind enough to offer his rare perspective to our questions on metal, media, and China.
First, we would appreciate it if you would kindly describe a bit
about yourself for the benefit of our readers. Since this is a metal
site, a brief history of your involvement with the genre would be
helpful as well (as would some forgiveness from you for the
metal-relatedness of many of the questions).
I know very little about metal in China, but I've read that Tang
Dynasty is often considered a leader of the "movement." How do you view
your personal role in shaping the music?
I don't think there's anyone who doubts that Tang Dynasty was where Metal
really got started in China. I certainly had a part in it: I introduced the
other guys in the band to much of the music that would influence them (bands
like Queensryche, for example), and I did come up with the name of the band.
But they changed me as much as I changed them. Playing with Tang Dynasty I
really found that the fusion of traditional Chinese music and Western Metal
works: it's not something I ever tinkered with before co-founding Tang
Dynasty. A lot of credit is due not just to Ding Wu, the band's singer and
rhythm guitar player; but also to our first producer, Landy Chang from Rock
Records in Taiwan, who saw the potential in the band and really helped shape
the direction of the music.
And mutual fear brings Peace,
Till the selfish loves increase;
Then Cruelty knits a snare,
And spreads his baits with care. -- William Blake, Songs of Experience: The Human Abstract
If you had never lived in the US, do you feel metal in China would
have effectively been stunted until much more recently?
I have no doubt that it would have taken off, but it might have been a bit
later and there might not have been quite such a home-grown success story,
Tang Dynasty, to look up to for young Metal players. Tang Dynasty gave
Chinese players and fans their first Chinese guitar hero, Lao Wu (Liu
Yijun), and showed them that Metal despite its clearly western origins could
be recognizably Chinese and still really authentically ass-kicking. I think
if I hadn't started proselytizing in the late 80s, by the early 90s there
were enough other American musicians coming to China and exposing people to
Metal that there would have been a kernel to the scene anyway, and it would
have snowballed like it did with the availability of cheap pirated discs in
the mid-90s and Internet MP3 downloads and sharing by 2002/2003 all the
same.
What has caused more run-ins with Chinese officials (if any): playing
metal or having a well-regarded Internet presence?
There really haven't been "run-ins" at all, either for me personally or for
the Metal genre in China as a whole. The worst that will happen is a bit of
censorship of lyrics, but it's not really onerous. Unfortunately Metal is
still just too marginal in China to really catch the attention, for better
or worse, of Chinese officials. They have much bigger things to worry about.
And certainly the kind of stuff I do and say on the Internet isn't something
that's going to get Chinese authorities breathing down my neck. It's all
pretty innocuous.
Having experienced both extensively, is there anything you prefer
about life in the "liberal, bourgeois West" to life in China (during any
time)?
Sure, there are things about the West that I still really enjoy whenever I'm
back there. The air quality comes to mind! It's always a thrill to go to
record stores; I like owning CDs and not just having digital music on my
iPod, so that's one thing I miss. There aren't any world-class record stores
in China. And even though there's a great live scene here, it's still rare
that major international acts come to Beijing, let alone smaller, more
interesting acts. But for 99% of what I want out of life, China either meets
or exceeds my needs. There's a dynamism and buoyancy to life here that comes
from living in a place where life just gets better pretty much every day.
It's a really exciting place to live still, and I've been able to play the
kind of role here that I simply wouldn't have been able to play had I never
come to China.
How do you feel heavy metal fits into this general Western cultural
current; is it drastically different from rock music in itself?
Like rock itself, Metal has subdivided into so many subgenres that it's
really impossible to make generalizations about how it fits into Western
culture anymore. There are attitudes, habits of mind, behavioral and even
ideological tendencies that correlate pretty strongly to every subgenre, so
that Deathcore fans are really, really different than people who like, say,
Progressive Metal like Symphony X or Dream Theater. You have everything from
misanthropic nihilists to just plain music geeks who might be really
mainstream in other ways. Once upon a time you could make generalizations,
but not any more.
Is there any more or less differentiation between rock and metal in a
more information-tight society?
I don't think that in the last 30 years, deliberate information control in
China has had ANYTHING to do with either the development of rock and metal
or differentiation between and among all the different genres and subgenres
of music. The simple truth is that musical tastes in China are mainly
dictated by marketing and by cultural aesthetic preferences. The former,
when it comes to music, tends to favor the kind of candy-ass Mandopop and
Cantopop (which sometimes has the nerve to call itself rock!), and the
latter -- the cultural aesthetic preference -- is still relatively unsophisticated
outside of the fringe scenes in a handful of cities. Sad, really, but in
this case I don't honestly think it's the government's fault in any
meaningful way.
Along those lines, there have been stories recently in mainstream
press covering the "rise" of heavy metal in Islamic nations. Do you
think there is any parallel in this to metal's gaining in popularity in
China?
I think Metal faces a whole lot more difficulty in Islamic societies,
particularly in really theocratic or heavily religious polities. In China
there are occasional flare-ups of anti-western sentiment, but they've never
in my memory had a cultural dimension. They're always political. You see
self-described punks rockers or Metalheads in China -- people who clearly have
close cultural affinities to the West -- take part in these sometimes. There's
a decoupling of politics and culture. I don't think that's so true in
Islamic societies. If Metal has failed to gain popularity in China it has
nothing to do with either religion or state controls.
Metal lends itself to lyrics of a "blasphemous" nature as well as
anything, but there are plenty of other genres that are just as noisy
and iconoclastic that could seemingly have a similar effect when
directed at the status quo. Are punk/hardcore and related genres
gaining in popularity in China as well?
Metal lyrics in China don't tend to be "blasphemous," in part because
there's nothing that really stands in for Judeo-Christian dogma to blaspheme
against. The state hasn't made an enemy of Metal, and so Metal doesn't make
an enemy of the state here. I have strong suspicions that other genres, like
punk (and to a much lesser extent, hardcore, which isn't well represented in
China that I know of) tend to write more iconoclastic lyrics -- defiant,
anti-authoritarian, even politically critical -- out of a cynical knowledge
that doing so gets the noticed by the western media, which laps that kind of
shit up.
I can't read Tang Dynasty's lyrics...I'm wondering if you could
please comment on some of the general themes they cover, and from where
you drew influence for them.
First of all, I've never had a hand in writing lyrics either for Tang
Dynasty or Chunqiu. Tang Dynasty drew lyrical influences from the Chinese
poetic tradition (which really reached a peak in the eponymous dynasty,
618-907 A.D.), and like Chinese poetry, the lyrics are highly imagistic and
even pretty sentimental. There are a lot of themes of heroism, romanticism,
that sort of thing. There's also quite a bit of Buddhist influence,
especially in the lyrics for some of the songs on the second album, Epic.
Chunqiu also goes in for the imagistic approach, and also draws on
timelessly Chinese poetic themes, as well as mythological, heroic,
historical, and philosophical themes in it.
In your view, is "protest music" a limiting term, and does it apply
to heavy metal in any way?
I don't think "protest music" is genre-specific, and I don't think there are
many genres of music that either abjure it altogether. So there are Metal
bands who do it, and those who don't. In China, to the extent that protest
applies to Metal, it's really a protest against social conformity and
slavishness to mainstream pop music tastes, not political protest. I've
never really gone in for the latter through music, but that's just me. I
figure that if I have something I feel strongly about politically or
socially, I can offer more nuance and substance in an essay than in a song
with rhymed verses ad a repeating chorus. I'm not into slogans. I know that
at least in China, the country's had too much by way of slogans already.
In a recent article, you touched on the "virtues of piracy" and
called for a general openness in China to Western media. Can you please
elaborate on what benefit to China you see coming from this openness,
particularly in regard to entertainment media?
I think piracy -- physical disk piracy, file sharing, MP3 downloads and all
that -- helped to really create an appetite for and knowledge of western
entertainment media. There's a point at which it goes too far, of course,
and I'm inclined to think we're at or past that right now, but there's no
doubt in my mind that the availability of western entertainment media at
prices Chinese consumers could afford is during the 90s and the earlier part
of this decade built a market that the same companies grumbling so loudly
now will be able to tap into in a very lucrative way down the road.
In the West there was (was -- I would call it gone now), of course,
a substantial "underground" for heavy metal tape trading well up until
digital media democratized the creation and distribution of music in
general. Can any difference be discerned between something like this
and piracy such as in China?
There was certainly a whole lot of tape trading in China in the early days,
but back then we were talking about a fan base so small that and so
geographically confined -- just to Beijing, really -- that it wasn't substantial.
What happens now with the easy distribution of digital music is the same
thing but on a much more massive scale, practically without cost and
frictionless to boot. It's something that has upended the music industry as
we know it, and if I really knew the way forward out of this I'd be a rich
mother by now.
To what degree have you seen ethnic nationalism used as a
reactionary measure in China recently, particularly within heavy metal
music (where it has often been made a component over the years, though a
controversial one)?
I don't think I've seen instances of "ethnic nationalism" in Chinese Metal.
The few instances I've seen where Han Chinese musical or visual elements -- or,
for that matter, elements drawn from minority nationalities of China -- it's
never been reactionary in any sense of the word I'm aware of. That's not to
say that it hasn't been misinterpreted in that way. A lot of people assumed
that Tang Dynasty, or even Chunqiu, was some cipher for anti-modernism and a
desire to go back to some mythic golden age, but that was never the case:
The name of the band in the case of Tang Dynasty was meant to evoke the
age's cosmopolitan nature, and its embrace of things foreign. This was
really the source of that dynasty's legendary greatness. It's not
"nationalistic" in any sense. Quite the contrary. I think using a genre like
Metal, which is unarguably western in origin, to assert Chinese nationalism
would be a complete contradiction and wouldn't convince anyone in their
right mind.
Is heavy metal malleable enough to act in multiple ways at once --
say, both against "democracy" but for freedom in different instances and
in different places -- or are there more "correct" interpretations of
its basic impetus?
Yes, I think it possesses that malleability but I haven't really seen it
employed to ends like you describe. I think only in rare instances is it
harnessed for political ends at all. But in China it's definitely used to
vent the same sorts of emotions as in the west -- things we're all familiar
with.
What conceivable event might make you move from China at this point?
Right now, it'd be pretty hard to think of something that would compel me to
move short of massive civil unrest -- something I rate as extremely unlikely -- or
a conflagration involving the U.S. triggered by a precipitous move toward
independence by Taiwan that Washington unwisely decided to intervene in.
Other than that, I do plan at some point to go back to the U.S. when my (now
four-year-old) daughter starts college eventually. But that's what, 13 years
off, so who knows what'll happen between now and then?
What will (or what does) an open China provide to the world that an
open West has not already provided?
An open China has clearly already provided the world with inexpensive
consumer goods and is moving up the value chain to become, within our
lifetimes, a major force in innovation. By that I don't just mean tech
innovation, though that will doubtless be an important part of it; I also
mean cultural innovation, plumbing the depths of traditional Chinese culture
to give the world a taste of, among other things, a rich literary tradition
of which the world now knows very little.
Being heavily involved with digital media, what drawbacks can you
envision for children fully entrenched in the digital age in China? In
the United States?
It's the same in China as it is in the U.S., or perhaps even worse because
there's such a lack of compelling entertainment alternatives. Don't get me
wrong: The Internet's the greatest thing ever, and it's been a tremendous
force for good wherever it's seen wide adoption. But kids spend way too much
time playing online games, and that's just plain unhealthy when you're
playing for days straight and skipping meals, not sleeping, and screwing up
in school. The Internet promotes too much of a sedentary lifestyle. I should
know: I need to spend way less time in front of my Mac and way more time in
the gym. Other than that, there are the usually dangers of digital stalkers
and sex offenders -- not as bad of an issue in China, to be sure -- plus various
scammers.
Thank you very much for the interview; parting words/shots, etc. can
go here.
Thanks for having me! I've been on a mission to get people around the world
aware of the really great Metal scene in China, which has dozens and dozens
of talented acts and a few real stand-outs, like Kungfu Voodoo, Suffocated,
and of course Chunqiu. You can download our stuff on iTunes. Unfortunately
we don't have other distribution outside of China currently.
Who looks upon a river in a meditative hour, and is not reminded of the flux of all things? Throw a stone into the stream, and the circles that propagate themselves are the beautiful type of all influence. Man is conscious of a universal soul within or behind his individual life, wherein, as in a firmament, the natures of Justice, Truth, Love, Freedom, arise and shine. This universal soul, he calls Reason: it is not mine, or thine, or his, but we are its; we are its property and men. And the blue sky in which the private earth is buried, the sky with its eternal calm, and full of everlasting orbs, is the type of Reason. That which, intellectually considered, we call Reason, considered in relation to nature, we call Spirit. Spirit is the Creator. Spirit hath life in itself. And man in all ages and countries, embodies it in his language, as the FATHER. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson, Nature (1836)
|
Sunday 28 June 2009 at 6:55 pm
For classical fans, a bit of space for discussion at our metal forum:
Metal Hall Classical Subforum
Tuesday 09 June 2009 at 4:22 pm
The guitarist/vocalist of Atomizer, Jason Healey, has started writing a book about the meaning and purpose of black metal. As he says on the site:
When I first discovered Black Metal in the early 90's it was as though some invincible force confronted me. Never had I witnessed a sound so primitive and raw, yet so atmospheric and bombastic. An essence that ran so much deeper than its fiendish visual and caustic tone would alone suggest. A bizarre paradox of ugliness, contempt and barbarism awash in philosophical revelation and profane religious fervor. Life, death, salvation and sacrifice - Black Metal truly is the malignant paradigm.
The Stench of Black Metal will attempt to corral the seemingly divergent positions its legions have granted it and provide what is hoped to be the definitive statement. This is not to suggest that the words of any one individual will bestow this, though readers may find divinity in a single declaration. It is not intended to be a guide or an explanation; rather a gateway to the determination of what dwells at its core. The quest to unveil its quintessence.
He's soliciting contributions from bands, zines, labels and fans. You can send in your statement at the website, The Stench of Black Metal, if you can address the following questions:
- Describe in your own words the quintessence of Black Metal.
- Is this point of view representative of a specific time, and if so at what point did this view manifest? (ie: March 1991)
- Has the definitive Black Metal statement been made and what is it?
- What purpose is Black Metal yet to serve?
For kicks, here's an outtake from my answer:
Quintessence to my mind means the indefinable abstract as it applies to the context of the universe as a whole. This means that an idea is needed that gets you to the starting point just before the main show. To my mind, this is a conflict between ego and id.
The ego is the agent of our consciousness about ourselves; self-awareness/self-consciousness is what separates us from animals and lets us look at reality and think how we might change it. That's the essence of our technology, which is how we have evolved out of ape status. At the same time, the ego is limited by having to put into a present tense, single-focus stream a complex reality of many factors. It does this by subtracting out all factors but one, and then focusing on that factor as a means to a single desired result. This really limits logic.
The id is less limited. It is not self-controlling like our ego, and in contrast is a wild west of impulses and emotions and aesthetic notions. When our ego is put into a social situation, it starts treating the world like a personality, which screws up our sense of cause/effect logic. The ego then becomes overactive because it sees humans as the cause of the world, not vice-versa, and so we get caught up in social notions like popularity, democracy, "safety," social status and abstract moral conceptions.
Social thinking uses negative logic to organize us against what we fear to deny it or banish it. This long chain of events means that we get ruled by fear, through our ego as it interacts with other egos. The id knows no such boundaries. It likes what it likes because it seems cool, or epic, or beautiful, so it's not always trying to censor itself to avoid threats. It just goes ahead and does what it thinks is a pleasurable mental experience, even if that means horror or cruelty or amoral acts.
Black metal resembles European literary Romanticism -- stuff like Blake, Goethe, Wordsworth and Coleridge -- because both see the individual destroying the individual as a gateway to the id. Lose yourself in the beauty of contemplating ancient ruins, or in martial arts, or in meditative thought and soon you are beyond good and evil. You are no longer self-aware, but aware of the abstract structure of reality and how its goods and evils interact to produce a constant, renewing reality. That is beauty and it's the domain of the id, not the ego, which fears beauty that might be deadly.
If you had to try to put the quintessence of black metal into two words, it would be just that "deadly beauty" or "lawless beauty." Like all metal, it views the world from a historical sense of the epic, in which the individual is a means of seeing truth but not a goal in itself. This anti-human view lets us escape our self-awareness and social thinking to see reality as a series of logical processes.
Nature is a process that ignores the individual. It is a blind, simplistic process that works like a big organic machine. It tries everything, and then kills off the failures. This is why nature seems cruel to us, because we're thinking from the view of the individual. "What if I were the mouse in the Eagle's claws?" Yet it's that cruelty that gets us not only life itself, but higher form of life, because each puzzle in our environment that we beat made us more intelligent, more capable as a species.
All of our social thinking is in denial of this fact. We detest predation, inequality, death, defecation, disease, horror and fear. Metal has since 1969 been reminding us that these things exist, and we cannot just shut them out of our minds, or we blind ourselves to the good and bad in life. Black metal took this furthest by using the emphasis on logical structure that came from death metal, and adding to it a sense of melody and atmosphere.
In doing so, it fulfilled an archetype of European art that has been struggling for a voice for centuries: the primal Romantic outlook. In this view, we must live for what is beautiful, and we must not be afraid to see some things as better than others and -- some would say "arbitrarily" to please their friends -- select those and praise those highly while letting the others suffer in the dark.
Romantic literature can be summed up in this phrase from Blake: "The cut worm forgives the plough." Forget morality, because it's focused on the means, which are individuals. Focus on the ends -- what is beauty? How do we create it? If we do that, we find life isn't a plodding process of obedience but an onward quest for improving ourselves through adversity and a basic reverence for the process of life itself. That's the meaning of black metal that I see.
I hope this project makes it to print. It has obstacles ahead. But it's a worthy goal, putting into words what the vague images of music and visual arts made us feel.
Monday 01 June 2009 at 4:12 pm
 Heavy metal came from horror movie soundtracks, loud rock, and progressive music mixed into a single package. This style differentiated itself by singing about epic, historical views of humanity and the dark subjects such thinking brings up, in opposition to the self-centered ramblings of rock musicians. It also brought in a new style of playing, where lead rhythm phrases were made of moveable chords into "riffs" which allowed greater complexity in songs, even if it reduced harmonic depth. With such a momentous birth, it took metal a couple generations to catch up with itself.
After its birth, it almost got assimilated by heavy rock and glam bands, but then bounced back by mixing aggressive punk hardcore into the mix. This new style evolved through thrash, which was crossover music for skateboarders, and speed metal, which was more traditional heavy metal, before exploding into form with death metal and black metal.
These styles fulfilled what Black Sabbath had started: creation of an entirely alien, post-human, horror-infused lifeform. Death metal introduced structuralism, or a way of linking together riffs that made the structure of the song the guiding force in lieu of harmony, and black metal pioneered using melody and atmosphere within the death metal framework to make a complete new style.
This new style most clearly resembled early Baroque or ancient Greek music in its atonal framing in which modal patterns are used to build melody, and inherited the tradition of bands from classical to Tangerine Dream of making spacious, lengthy compositions that eschew the verse-chorus tradition of pop music. Metal had transcended rock music.
Once that new wave of music, emboldened by the new easy (mid-1980s vintage) of printing and selling CDs, exploded from its indie roots to popularity, it lost direction. Too much of its impetus had been based on being tiny and alienated; now it was big. Now the crowd wanted to come to it, but they also wanted to change it to be more like the rock music and punk with which they were familiar.
 Around 1994, the old guard started to pull back in confusion and pursue other things. In rushed the newcomers. They created two new styles which were basically the same thing: rock done in metal technique. The first, metalcore, mixed punk songs with metal riffs, but never "got" the death metal way of linking successive riffs in context. The second, nu-metal, added hip-hop bounce and alternative choruses to metal, but was basically metal riffs on top of rock songs.
Most death metal from the period 1994-2009 began to resemble metalcore. The riffs were no longer linked, but were variations on riff/chorus structures, and the swing and offbeat emphasis of rock music, and the desire of punk music to provide randomness, replaced the moody explorations of death metal. Black metal in turn got assimilated by underground punk, a cross between crustcore and shoegaze, which eschewed the ragged melodies for more predictable minor key pop songs.
For a long time, it seemed like the newcomers triumphed. Metal was bigger than ever before, in the numbers of fans and CDs sold. But a problem kept cropping up: it had produced no great works, only lots of "good" CDs. People bought "good" CDs and forgot them a few months later because they were not particularly distinctive in content, even if they were distinctive in form. Nothing quite made it to the epic stage of being timeless.
Starting in 2006, and slowly accelerating, this trend -- which is as old as the hills, since the first thing that happens to every new genre is that they hybridize it with rock music -- began to fade as labels found they couldn't pump out the new music fast enough because within weeks its novelty wore off and it was forgotten. Profits turned to losses, and then in 2008, a recession hit, driving many labels and zines out of business.
This lucky break helped traditional metal come back into the spotlight. Over the last two years, band reunions and the formation of new bands by old school personnel have become commonplace. Many of the results at first were bad as old school metallers tried to compete with the new sound; however, over the last six months, the balance has shifted and now old school bands are making old school music.
As the Maryland Death Fest illustrates, the crowds are turning out for the old bands and old style bands, even the youngest audience members. They're looking for a substantial musical experience and are tired of buying an underground version of the same thing they get on the radio.
The linked article illustrates the revolution that is happening in metal: younger people, newer fans and older fans alike are wanting the genre to uphold the styles and tradition of quality it once had. They're tired of disposable garbage and endless hype that just leads back into the same blender of all quality that is commercial rock music. Bring back the metal, they say, and people are listening.
ANUS predicted this trend in the middle 1990s, and made comparisons to hardcore and past generations of metal, and now we're being proven right. We knew that there would be a surge of newcomers, and then their lack of ideas would catch up with them, and people would abandon their contentless music for something more substantive. It just took a dozen years to manifest itself.
Saturday 30 May 2009 at 07:21 am
While most of the world has gone nuts trying to make black metal into a blasphemous yet trendy extreme, Blaspherian go back to the roots of the death metal genre. Allegiance to the Will of Damnation uses the simple riffs in complex formulations that made bands like Morpheus Descends and Asphyx favorites among the old school.
Nodding to the American punk tradition, Blaspherian also employ a number of one- and two-chord rhythm riffs that ride an unsyncopated rhythm into bounding, pummeling heaviness. Vocals resemble the occult rantings of Sadistic Intent or Resuscitator, and song pacing calls to mind the spirit of the aforementioned Asphyx. At its heavier moments, this EP will appeal to those who enjoyed early Obituary or Infester.
While it does not work to distinguish itself in style, this music gains a voice of its own by how it combines the artifacts of the past and finds a new voice for them within that style. This expression, while somewhat chaotic as first releases always are, surges forth with a voice of its own despite keeping itself firmly anchored in the old school tradition. In that, it succeeds where others have gone nuts over style and forgotten substance.
Friday 24 April 2009 at 7:40 pm
Originally inspired by the National Day of Prayer that religious groups created to draw attention to their beliefs, the National Day of Slayer was thought to be a holiday on June 6, 2006 -- that's 6/6/06 -- but now it has grown. http://www.nationaldayofprayer.org/ Thanks to support and enjoyment around the world, the National Day of Slayer is now the INTER-National Day of Slayer, and it happens every year on June 6 starting at hour six. On this day, metalheads worldwide stop the pointless activities of a boring world and listen to Slayer. International Day of Slayer is bigger than one nation, or even one band. It's a celebration of metal music through one of its most articulate spokesbands. It's also revelry in the spirit that makes metal great. So on June 6, stop everything... and listen to SLAYER! http://www.nationaldayofslayer.org/
Saturday 18 April 2009 at 4:23 pm
I was goofing off on the internet the other day and saw some commentary on the popularity of this meme:
tl;dr
Then, as I slogged through the latest round of promos tonight, another one came to mind:
dm;wr
It describes the black metal I'm hearing now that isn't utter crap. It's not bad, but it's on the high end of mediocrity instead of the low end of genius. As a result, my thoughts on it can be summarized as Didn't mind; wouldn't reach for it again.
Hence, dm;wr -- didn't mind, wouldn't reach.
Wednesday 15 April 2009 at 11:45 am
Once upon a time, black metal had a mystical component. Its bands tried to write songs about an idea, and shied away from writing songs that were variations on a known form.
This is a split as big as the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning for rock music, which got popular because it's easy for anyone to make a variant on a template. That way, everyone could participate.
People now like to act as if black metal is still a mystical genre. They take themselves seriously, use ancient and blasphemous language, and claim grand importance for CDs that sell to 50 people who can't tell them apart from any of their other CDs.
There is no unity in the genre, just a lot of people using it for their own ends, namely to have something to do and some reason to claim they're important. "But I am Gezagorath of Impietorturous Blasphemic Anal Mayehm!"
I think it's time to just declare it rock 'n roll. It's no longer far from rock music in structure or theory; it's variations on the pop song format with pentatonic solos, minor/major shifting, and three-chord riffs about the same handful of tired symbols. Not even grandmothers are frightened by Satan and corpsepaint anymore.
It's also changed in outlook. It used to be the genre of the frontier, of singing about that which was both lawless and a terrifying confrontation with mortality, but also permitted exploration outside the narrow-minded humanist herd mentality. Now people say blatantly humanistic things to keep their music safe, and wonder why we're all bored.
Yep, it's just all rock 'n roll to me now. I don't see the point pretending the post-1994 black metal is anything more than another variation on hardcore punk, a genre which also lost its mystique and got really normal only a few years after blossoming.
Everyone can participate, and so there is nothing mysterious or unusual about black metal now. We need to start treating it like any other rock or punk music, and stop posturing and pretending we're true to some ideal that ended long ago. Burn all the idols, not just the convenient ones.
Either you make music to communicate something unique, in which case form is shaped by substance, or you make music to fit within the form that's popular, in which case substance is shaped by form.
The paradox is that all substance comes from observing the world, not from within the self (a form), so the only substance comes from reality itself. Songs about self-motivations are about the form of human beings, not the profundity of life itself. They're narcissistic and fall into the same problem as songs where substance is shaped by any other type of form.
Like hardcore punk before it, and speed metal and death metal, black metal fell into the trap of letting in the masses. At that point, the level of quality declined because the goal was inclusivity and not the art in itself. So now we have a lot of black metal that is basically dressed-up garage rock.
The solution is to be intolerant of weak metal. If you love anything, don't coddle its failures. Instead, nurture its successes, even to the point of radicalism. Acceptance is another word for lower standards, and lowest common denominator genres converge on that optimal utilitarian pop style known as rock 'n roll.
Saturday 04 April 2009 at 9:09 pm
Scheduled for release on April 9, Beherit Engram faces high expectations. Thanks to the generosity of some people devoted to art, we were able to hear six of the seven tracks on the new album, and get you a brief review.
Engram thrusts forward through the past in a return to form for black metal, but takes it to the next dimension past Burzum's Hvis Lyset Tar Oss, which effectively ended black metal by taking it to ambient in the first place. Developing on the concepts shared between ambient music and metal, Engram is really raw but intensely structured, with a deepening mood.
Instead of opting to make a black metal/ambient fusion, Beherit combine the ideas of raw primitive ambient black metal with atmospheric music that works with the texture of sound more than discrete notes. Faster than Drawing Down the Moon, it resembles the material from the Archgoat split given more structure and prismatic depth without losing its primitive gestalt. This is a smart way of not trying to reinvent black metal, but recontexting its riffs in such a way as to pick up where Burzum's Hvis Lyset Tar Oss left off, which is an attempt to create a mood where one is barely aware that there's music but gets lost in the muscular clarity of a raw emotion reflecting a primal, naturalistic reality.
The use of repeated non-distorted motifs reminds me of Burzum's Hlidskjalf as well. There's a clear Sarcofago influence, and something that sounds like a fusion between Bathory albums The Return and Octagon, sometimes augmented with a noisy, melodic cornering reminiscent of later Darkthrone. Like most Beherit works, these songs uncannily grow on you like mysticism in the darkness.
Black metal has been so stale and boring for the last fifteen years, it's awesome to have something to look forward to with excitement again. This does not just rehash the past, but inherits it, and subtly develops its ideas consistenly and yet with creativity, moving to a new space for this music to flourish. Engram may win you over surprisingly quickly; it's organized, has heart, and in the transitions of its dark moods tells us something for the ages about how to survive humanness with elan. Perhaps it is a template for the next generation of black metal.
01. Axiom Heroine
02. Destroyer of Thousand Worlds
03. All in Satan
04. Pagan Moon
05. Pimeyden Henki
06. Suck My Blood
07. Demon Advance
Length: 43:02
Spinefarm pre-order page
Saturday 04 April 2009 at 08:37 am
My formula for greatness in a human being is amor fati: that one wants nothing to be different, not forward, not backward, not in all eternity. Not merely bear what is necessary, still less conceal it -- all idealism is mendaciousness in the face of what is necessary -- but love it.
- Friedrich Nietzsche, "Why I Am So Clever" in Ecce Homo, section 10
This a great summation of Nietzsche's method; an outlook unswayed by the petty gusts of popular opinion, or common knowledge, in pursuit of what is real, including acknowledging both the "ugly" and the "beautiful."
It is also essential to the approach taken by metal: recognize the world for what it is, pull no punches in describing it and use this relentlessly regardless of mere social consequences.
ATHEIST, one of death metal's most cosmically literate bands, seems to agree:
Another notch in a cosmic climb
Reveal our sanity, reveal your plan divine
To grasp reality is to grasp your biggest fear, you see
Every circumstance is very meant to be
- ATHEIST, "Piece of Time"
Thursday 02 April 2009 at 3:04 pm
Stealing depends on the intent of the downloader and the artist.
With death metal, for example, where 5000 CDs sold is an out-of-the-ballpark smash, artists love it when you download their music -- much of which is out of print. They gain fans; sometimes, enough fans leads to CDs being re-pressed.
If the artist wants to gain fans, and the downloaders want to buy the CD if they really connect with the music, the situation is good.
As with all downloads, there are some people who will never buy anything and will just leech. However, they weren't going to buy the CDs anyway. Leeches just leech. DRM doesn't stop them, but it does hassle ordinary users who might want a second copy of Deicide's "Legion" for the car or something.
In my view, downloading is a boon to small and niche genres with fanatical fans; it's a loss for big box store style pop genres, whose fans only care for novelty. Oh well -- the destruction of that music is a win for art :)
TechCrunch
Death metal never plays by the rules. People buy the music because it's eternal, not new. They want to own it so they never lose it, not because it's worth something outside of its enjoyment. And, almost everyone else hates it and thinks it's degraded noise made by failed reprobates. But luckily, not playing by the rules means you're outside the popularity leads to money and power game. Instead, you can focus on the art itself. That's transcendence of a kind.
Archives
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2008
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2008
01 May - 31 May 2008
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2008
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2008
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2008
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2008
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2008
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2008
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2008
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2009
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2009
|