We are born and only later awaken to the possibilities of our lives. Our brains come first, then our minds grow within them. In this awakening process, we come to realize that an external world exists, and operates by consistent principles. If at that point we decide that we like being alive, we change our values to encourage the life process that produced us.
I. Nihilism
II. Integralism
III. Blasphemies
Whatever indictments of violent pronunciations of change occur here, there is no laying of "blame": blame is a way of deflecting the onus of leadership from ourselves. We must change the motivation of society as a whole by first recognizing that its future is in our hands.
Life does not offer immediate feedback on bad decisions. It takes many years of dumping toxic waste into rivers before the cancers and mental retardation become evident; you can live your life with a person and have children with them before realizing they are mentally unhinged in a subtle way, passing that on to your children.
As modern society is poisoned by its pollution and wars, and as it rots from within through loss of consensus and thus lacks motivation beyond individual material enrichment, it becomes clear that without a change of path all life will be lost. It is trivial and foolish to concern ourselves with the sacrifices of even most individuals; if the whole is preserved, there will always be life.
Rome Falling
As is convenient, we like to believe our society is the only one, a product of all that has come before it and thus not inclined to fall as they have. As reading history reveals that each has had this weakness in its final years, we should become suspicious.
The disease of a society cannot be described as a symptom, but an ideology which encourages tolerance (and thus growth) of its symptoms. In modern society, the enemy is a passive self-gratifying worldview on the part of individuals, and it occurs worldwide.
Ignorance
Without intervention of some intent, the default state of nature is ignorance. It starts with "good enough" and evolves to something higher. In our modern time, we consider "ignorance" to be a lack of knowledge of some socially-accepted "fact," but an older definition meant a lack of awareness of the system as a whole.
The default course of humanity will be to fail at leadership, and thus not to curtail its own growth, consuming all available food and collapsing into a primitive state. For people with low self-esteem or hatred in their hearts, this is an assumed state, and unwittingly they work to perpetuate it.
The Modern Ego
In this age we market ourselves to find sustenance, friends and mates. Advertising does not reward complex truths, but simple public image. This public image marketing makes us dependent upon the social-technological reality in which it exists.
As a result, we are unwilling to transgress and point out the failures of this time, as it would reflect badly on our self-image. If you offend this taboo, you will be denied opportunity.
Failure
Long-term plans cannot be assessed within even a few generations, but take time to show their true colors, as over centuries an idea reaches every level of society and changes it to reflect allegiance to that idea. When the idea finally has dominance and has beaten all serious threats to its rule, then it may be assessed.
Modern society, with its religion and industry and socially-constructed reality, has only over the last few centuries come into such predominance, but already the effects are seen. Natural ecosystems vanish as we consume land, pollution taints the world, and individually we are unfulfilled, with low self-esteem and minimal challenges ahead, laboring long hours to push the right buttons in the machine.
When we consider our modern reality, we tend to see it as all that is, and consider deviation impossible. After all, look how large and powerful it is! Yet the decay continues from within, and when that matches in our minds to a deep and barely expressible dissatisfaction, we can see how the reality of our civilization does not live up to its ideals.
Trends
When there is no actual goal, and no heroism present, what supplants leadership is trends. These are "new ideas" which are restylized versions of the old, and are traded between individuals as a means of establishing a social hierarchy. The monkey with the most contacts who devotes more time than others to social control will have the "new" at all times, and thus can cause others to obey it.
These trends have no functional superiority to older ways of doing things, but because we are caught up in the process of following trends, we do not assess the process as a whole and soon take it for granted. As part of the process of moving toward a trend-based society, it is necessary to claim that traditional ways are "outdated" and "inferior" so that there is a need for newer things.
Wiser minds realize that trends exist in timeframes of a few centuries at most, and thus that ways which have always functioned and worked well for the people of a country are preferrable to some "new" idea with nothing to back it up but theory.
Consensus
It is natural to be afraid of authority, especially since it is most commonly abused in this time. Yet it is clear without consensus - agreement that some values are supported and others are not - a society disintegrates, and in the process, authority becomes arbitrary on a personal level and thus, most commonly abused as it is in this time.
The leaders among humans must make the most basic decisions about its direction and institute these as consensus. Not everyone will approve, but there is nothing to say that their viewpoints are any more "correct," therefore it is important to move ahead in the decision-making process and to let the disadvantages be dealt with as we can.
Without a goal that benefits the whole of a civilization, authority becomes a means of internal sparring, with people divided against others for the thrill of exercising a "power" defined in social terms alone, and thus, illusory.
Democracy
It is impossible to please everyone, because no decision except inaction favors everyone. Decisions must be made, not all of which will be "just," but they allow our civilization to move forward in the process of solving problems instead of remaining paralyzed in fear of offense, injustice or inequality. Paralysis leaves no choice but to accept the lowest common denominator, which with each incremental destruction of consensus leads to an even lower standard being sought. Once that path is taken, a spiral into oblivion follows.
Utopia
There is no utopia. Perfection would be entropy. Therefore, our ideal society does not aim to eliminate war, suffering, discontent and hatred, but to achieve a state in which these disadvantages do not derail the goals and values of the civilization. When we cast aside the illusory and unreasonable expectation of, for example, ending killing and aggression, we can stop focusing on the negative (eliminating things) and instead focus on the positive (what we wish to create and achieve).
Absolutism
The psychosis of a modern time is absolutism, which is the idea that a linear standard or method is the singular path to survival in a chaotic world. It denies the inherent ordering of nature, and implies a binary division, because if there is one correct path anything that is not that path must be incorrect. The roots of absolutism are in fear of death, which is mentally excluded by exclusive imposition of a human social order.
Absolutism is a projection of sovreignty of the individual taken to an extreme of denying all that may harm or end the self. This thought process occurs when heroic goals, which give significance to life and the natural world, are forgotten. Without any goals above individual preservation, society turns toward the absolute sovreignty of the individual and denies anything, including death, which breaches that barrier.
Absolutist concepts function in our minds because they are universals, and seem to describe an order which applies to every situation. Any term which has no compromise with the complexity of life, and seems to replace a chaotic natural reality with a numeric or symbolic order, appeals to our mind as having an inviolable logic. These are the concepts we turn to when in fear.
Any world which functions by transaction is not that simple and thus contradictions with absolutist dogma are plentiful. Since absolutist thought does not admit exceptions, the indicators of these contradictions are demonized. Absolutist doctrine is the origin of the religious, technological and social developments in Indo-European civilization since the collapse of its original order in the late Vedic period.
In religion, morality posits a single path to "enlightenment" ("peace" and "love"), a state where preserving human lives overrides all other objectives, even if death could occur in achieving something positive for the world as whole. Absolutist religions are generally dualistic, meaning that they believe that there is another reality concurrent with this one in which "pure" linear order prevails.
In technology, absolutism allows us to see the function of machines as divided from nature. Nature is disorder; machines are order. We take raw materials from the chaos of nature, ram them into ovens and purify them, then shape the pure elements into machines. These machines break down over time, through entropy, which is part of the chaos we fight with more machines.
In civilization, absolutism leads to both unchecked universal concepts of "positive" and an attitude of violent control of the "negative." An example is the overused word "freedom," which supposes that the individual can do anything desired. No society will permit someone to be "free" to construct a backyard nuclear device, thus limitations are justified in terms of moral "right."
Control mechanisms work by asserting the objective, universal (one-size-fits-all) existence of a "right" path, in which a linear standard is upheld and all deviation is punished. Punishment is a form of negative feedback which is supposed to operate on humans much as on machines, driving them back toward the "positive" incentives offered by conformity. This is called the "carrot and stick" approach.
The mechanistic worldview of absolutism leads us to insist that all people make the same decisions because of enlightened self interest, thus act in the same way when market forces are brought to bear on them. This "invisible hand" is presupposed to shape capitalist societies in a whole toward "enlightened" ("good") ends, as is "Social Darwinism" assumed to ensure that, because earning money is "good," the best people in society will be those who rise to the top of the economic power structure.
Absolutism allows us to believe that anyone who works within our system, even if it destroys any chance of achieving their goals, is "good" and anyone who does not is a "terrorist." It makes us believe in contextless absolutes and distrust anything that does not fit into that artificial reality. The best example is children's books, which a century ago emphasized positive attributes of life, but now are cautionary tales against transgressing individual autonomy, no matter how much that individual transgresses positive attributes of life.
Technology
Confusing goals and methodology is a common error, as once the task is conquered or forgotten there is a need to find something to keep one busy, so one relies on the symbol of the task - namely, that which is done to achieve it, or the methodology. Such is the case with technology. Once something designed to "free" us from hard labor, it is now the means of keeping us enshrined to easier but disturbingly pointless labor.
Technology is a product of nature being redirected by human intent. As such, it can be used to complement the world as whole, or in a way that denies the fundamental truth of our connection to a whole. This latter use encourages an absolutist mindset, similar to that of religion, in which we treat all situations as methodological problems and do not consider finding a consensus toward enduring values at all.
In a saner world, technology would be applied selectively. There would be no electric can openers or home entertainment systems, but people would have access to computers and networks, as well as superior medical and research facilities. Medicine would not attempt to save those with congenital diseases, but would ensure better routine care for the healthy. Most homes would be expected to operate with electric water heaters, stoves, and lamps, with a single computer.
The Lion and the Lamb
On the Right, we have the aggressive self-assertive types, and on the Left, the pacifists numbed by fear of death to the point of denying accomplishment. Back and forth the tug of war goes, with us veering between disaster for each extreme and congratulating ourselves when it is over. Our side won! And the battle begins again.
First the Lion is what we become: crawling our way out of a dimly lit evolutionary past, we kill and eat and finally, have asserted a Civilization. Then as the civilization gets taken for granted, and unfenced nature is pushed farther away, the Lamb becomes predominant, and soon the civilization is fractured by selfishness. Another state follows these, if growth continues (more likely Rome falls).
The truest conqueror is not as much a warrior, as a creator; when an area is conquered, a civilization is established to keep it in perpetuity. This requires a compassion for life like that of the Lamb, but in a world-reaching view, like that of the Lion; this new animal has no place in our time, but will replace it.
Terror
Our governments promise protection from those who oppose our political and social system. There are always new enemies, and if not, we can fight harder against the old. In our public mind, they are "terrorists" or "anarchists" or "fascists" - the Other that opposes our Order. When we project all of our failings onto such enemies, we deny the terror within.
When researchers in Sweden analyzed the survivors of a hostage situation in Stockholm, they found that captives bonded with captors because the latter were in effect "providers" and sustainers of the captives, protecting them from a potentially dangerous external order. This "Stockholm Syndrome" is often used to describe any case where those controlled by a malevolent authority find themselves defending, and even justifying, it.
Vegetarianism
F.W. Nietzsche detested vegetarians, for in his view they were attempting to avoid the suffering of animals, and considered that a victory in itself; his view was similar to the Pagan view that suffering is part of life, and what matters is making the achievements of life significant so that suffering is secondary to pleasure. Adolf Hitler, no passive avoider of suffering, was a vegetarian. How are the two reconciled?
In the seventy years that passed between Nietzsche's words and the rise of Adolf Hitler, population grew and capitalist industrial republics dominated the earth. No longer were chickens raised by families tilling land owned for generations, but long assembly lines of hired people slaughtered chickens mass-produced in giant barns. This puts a price tag on nature, and divides up natural ecosystems into resources.
For this reason, many modern vegetarians and vegans are meat-avoiders because they are meat-industry-avoiders, recognizing inherently that anytime one uses monetary value to divide up nature, there is no ending point and all will be sold and mass farmed until death is the order of the land. It is wisest to recognize this "lifestyle choice" as what it is subconsciously: an abstention from an industrial ownership of that which belongs only to itself.
Dysgenics
Modern society would like to believe it is free from any kind of breeding problem, but to not make a choice about what is desired is to choose the lowest common denominator. Our society rewards those who are the most inoffensive and likely to obey normative control systems, thus we are slowly breeding a harvest of fools. They have basic intelligence, but lack moral and leadership capacity; a study of history reveals this type of person is common wherever a great empire has collapsed. They have the surface traits of those who established the empire, but lack the depth of understanding that allowed it to become.
Family and Women
Physical sensations are part of the means of life and not the goals of a creative mind. Sex as a goal is a product of careful marketing of the forbidden than a target of merit. Advertising would collapse if sex were not both a taboo subject and something easily sold, even if only in the form of image via teenage models in clothing catalogs.
Our industrial and moral view of sexuality has led us to conclude that the end goal of relationships is both an absolute "love" and easy access to sexual gratification, causing a neurosis of people alternating between religious love and gutter sexuality. It is healthier to realize that the end goal of heterosexual relationships is comradeship, a battle-partnership in establishing a home and producing offspring.
There is no higher complement one can pay to a person than to wish to breed with them, and if this offering is cheapened, it has no value. For those minds which are creative, relationships exist so that one may find a suitable comrade with whom to share the most sacred bond of human existence. The two are joined in life, and their irreplaceable time is spent with each other, and in new life, as their blueprints are combined to form children.
Gender wars occupy much of our media. It is proclaimed that men and women are "equal" and thus are expected to act equally in equal capacities, denying the beauty of the difference between them. That men are blockheads where women are wizards, and women confused where men are savants, is a form of natural specialization and diversity, and to attempt to norm the two is to destroy their unique roles and ultimately, remove power from them, even if they earn the same amount of money.
"Equality" between the genders cannot occur without destroying what makes each gender unique. We can choose to sacrifice this uniqueness in the name of a political token, or can realize that gender "equality" and conflict between the genders is a form of a political trend of the past thousand years, and ultimately, produces neither equality nor justice, but ongoing enmity and more fractured, manipulative relationships.
When lizards court, there is both pursuit, to establish that the male is at least physically capable to match his potential mate, and a test of tenderness, to see if the male is capable of enough compassion to breed a new generations of lizards who are also contemplative. Nature does not favor simply the biggest brute, nor simply the most intelligent, but a mixture of those factors and many more.
Should our society so fear "inequality" that it, through the mechanism of natural selection according to financial success, select to breed men and women into the same animal with different genitals, the intricate system by which humans select mates will be disrupted, and instead of considering infinite characteristics will consider few, breeding people with a lowest common denominator mentality.
Bigotry
It is necessary and essential that we be able to praise or criticize aspects of all things, including their existence as whole entities.
This must even include an analysis of genetic differences between the races, and the unsuitability of certain populations for existence among others; however, when this process degenerates into bigotry it is destructive. (If race- and caste-mixing is the problem, ending mixing is the solution, not destroying a caste.)
Bigotry is blaming external entities for a problem that is ultimately within. In the case of Indo-Europeans, it may be true that certain races or religious-ethnic groups do not belong within our own, but it is senseless to blame them: the problem is Indo-Europeans admitting them to our civilization, and the solution is for attitudes to change such that it is no longer so.
Taking out frustrations on these groups is a self-defeating action that is not coincidentally without heroic value. Heroism aims to change a situation, and that is done by reshaping Indo-European society such that degenerate actions and inappropriate cultures are not welcome, regardless of what form or appearance in which they arrive.
Symbol
Zen and the Eastern mystical experience teaches us to distrust both symbol and ego, but these distrusts quickly become goals in and of themselves, such that heroic focus is lost in introspection. All of life that we know comes via metaphor, including tokens or symbols, no matter what course of belief we take.
Like most methods, if the method of metaphor is used according to healthy, rational values, it is productive, and if not, destructive. Our values must override the tendency to accept these layers of metaphor as reality itself, such that we might mistake means (physical world, tokens) as ends (goals, meaning).
Much as body and mind present a paradox to us that is resolved in the whole, means and ends do also; our physical world is a medium through which we create change, but keeping it healthy is part of our goalset, because it is the entirety of reality and that which sustains us.
Nationalism
Any tribe that desires continued existence must quarantine itself ethnically and culturally from others, but not in an absolutist sense: it does not blind itself to the world. One may have friendships, and indeed deep and longstanding esteem and platonic love for people of other tribes, without breeding with them and assimilating them.
Nationalists must focus not on degrading other cultures, but celebrating their own, nurturing what makes it unique and fostering within it evolution so that it may reach its highest point of adaptation. Friendships and caring for people of other races remind us that others, too, have a place in the natural order, no matter how different they be.
The enemy of all peoples is internationalism, or the one-size-fits-all view of culture. Internationalism groups us all in cosmopolitan cities where there is no shared culture except money and novelty, so we have no lasting values and might as well merge into an average of each other. This destroys what has taken thousands of generations to build, and eliminates diversity.
Any society of a multicultural nature, in which many ethnicities coexist, is rapidly assimilated by its hybrids. In avoiding this outcome, Black Panthers, neo-Nazis, Zionists, Aztlanites and Asian separatists agree on the same values, and should consider each other allies, and, if they can overcome mutual fear of Otherness, potential friends.
Civility
Our absolute worldview has us believe that our society is on the path to right living and thus anything which is not with us is against us. We invent rules of civility in which we may discuss change, but by the nature of not offending those who are invested in the current society, civility prohibits discussion of any change from the present system.
For those who dissent to that degree, we invent one stereotype per generation with which to slander our enemies, whether "drug addict," "hacker," "anarchist," "racist" or "terrorist." These targets are hoped to explain away the dysfunction, but since the disease is within, they instead create an illogical public explanation and private paranoia.
Our social mentality becomes conditioned to see civility as a standard of compliance that separates us from the "bad people," therefore anyone who deviates from civility is seen as an enemy, regardless of their intent. Civility is used to regulate what can be discussed. The 1950s conservative McCarthyite and the 1990s liberal Clintonite are the same animal, using civility to banish dissident discourse.
Everyone is immobilized by their jobs and a need to self-market thus not offend. Neutralized by fulfillment of a socially-defined task, they retreat into private worlds in their free time. When older, they realize they have been prisoners in their own self-image.
Challenges of a "grab the ring" nature abound but these create nothing and are formed by the needs of others, not self or nature as a whole, thus are unfulfilling as tasks. Civility does not permit us to criticize this whole, thus we go into denial of its long-term consequences.
Jobs
The modern invention of "jobs," as opposed to vocations, is destructive for two reasons: passivity and absorption.
When one goes to a job, it is one of many possible places to practice an ill-defined specialization, thus there is far less work security than in previous eras. Further, the job as having an indefinite role may be eliminated or the workplace may change according to the whims of tyrannical bosses.
Because of this, one working a job, even in the professions, is thrust into a passive role of conforming to a system. All objectives are indirect, as revenue does not correspond exactly to being the best at what one does. All interaction requires recognition of the authority of others, and not offending coworkers. Thus one is rendered into a passive and compliant mode of thought.
Absorption occurs because jobs take up so much time, and leave little room for self-improvement. When the workday is done, there are still many tasks to be fulfilled to keep a home (and family) operational, and these take up most of the remaining "free time." Exhausted, one cannot pursue any serious course of work outside of the job, and thus when approaching any other task is a "weekender": someone who knows little and has no contiguous time to learn, thus is further at the mercy of the authority and offense of others.
Neo-Nazis
What replaced the Nazi movement of the 1930s and 1940s was a "neo-Nazi" concept that attempted to adapt Nazi ideals to the current political situation. The National Socialists in Germany transcended modern politics with its dysfunctional division between Right and Left, embracing a holistic view in which environmentalism and nationalism coexisted as part of the same impulse.
Although career leftists are arguably more deluded, "neo-Nazis" are unrealistic by supposing that, should racial equity be abolished and/or intruding populations removed, all would be well with our society. This is not so; our modern society is based on error and must be remade entirely, with a viewpoint that includes nationalism as well as other healthy values united to a central idea which is not so limited as racial separatism by itself.
What afflicts National Socialism and all other modern revivalist movements so far is that they have attempted to bring back the values of the past using modern methods. Government cannot take the place of culture, nor doctrine create the subtle learning at all levels of society that is needed. Nazism was a political movement that had cultural effects, but what is needed is a cultural and philosophical movement; its abstract ideals can be put into effect with political methods as needed, but its primary change will be intellectual and social.
Peace
Spiritual "peace" is not the same as political "peace." To find spiritual peace is to be at balance with the operation of the whole and its methods, thus to be undisturbed by what one must do and undergo as, regardless of its comfort level, it leads to positive outcomes. In this state of mind, both "good" and "evil" are methods for achieving a goal of health to the integral universe.
It does not mean to become passive, as that is to sleight the world by assuming it does not benefit from our natural activity, which includes suffering and death. Fear of evil is an easier motivation than love of the whole, and thus willingness to use its methods of good and evil.
Christians
Judeo-Christianity is clearly a destructive force in modern society, but it is a symptom of the degeneration of society as a whole, and eliminating it alone will not cure the disease of modern society. Further, people as a whole seek a means of expressing their spirituality and in recent memory in the West, have relied on Christian churches for this means.
What must therefore be done is to remake the Christian religion into something which carries the original Vedic ideals, including integralism, so that in a future time Indo-Europeans will as a whole make the transition to a religion continuing the Vedic spirit. As all spiritual beliefs are but views of the truth derived from our singular reality, it is possible to use any number of avenues, including Christianity, Buddhism, science, Hinduism and Islam, to reach that goal.
There are a handful of Christians who have misinterpreted their own religion in such a healthy way as to reinvent it, such as Meister Eckhart or Arthur Schopenhauer. In their minds, the errors of Christianity are common to a stage of all civilizations, and when the civilization is healthy, the positive aspects of the religion will come to dominate its neurotic ideas.
As F.W. Nietzsche pointed out, the primary illness of Judeo-Christian thought is its belief in pity, through which by giving to others we increase our self-esteem. As with drug addiction, any introduced stimulant produces a corresponding depression in its absence, thus forming the mechanism of addiction. It is more important to target this mechanism, as expressed in absolutist morality, than to target its carrier.
Evolution
Human evolution occurs through several "loops," or cycles in which patterns are tried and then tested for adaptability, of internal transaction before a civilization passes the tests necessary for it to survive autonomously.
One of these loops is a test of self-leadership with technology, and modern society is a necessary stage that will either kill us if we are unable to lead ourselves, or move us to a higher state. Technology enables us to operate without being directly dependent on nature, and thus is in itself a test of our goals.
If we revert to introspection and passivity after having lost dependence on the natural world, our ability to lead has been effectively dissolved and thus we will, like any organism reproducing out of control, consume all available food and self-destruct from within.
Jews
"The Jew is our misfortune," said a famous leader. A better way to look at this situation: the Jew is only appropriate in Jewish culture, as by the nature of values being exclusive to groups, Jewish values conflict with other cultures, causing a lack of consensus and thus degeneration.
Internationalists, or groups which have lost a single clear racial tradition, such as the Jews, have by nature long ago lost consensus and thus fallen back on the lowest common denominator. This is usually either blind supernaturalism, or a predatory materialism, both of which are evident in Judaism.
The genetic type which evolves under those circumstances will be shrewd, but will have base values and lack heroism. Jewish history in Indo-European cultures definitely suggests this type, as they have been continually involved in selling degrading products, working against cultural consensus and fragmented nationality by encouraging the "moral" invitation of other populations to dwell among them.
Sympathy for the Jews is a welcome practice. Having lost their national roots, they are a wandering tribe that is forever alienated, as anywhere it goes, it is an outsider. This outsiderness incurs a subtle resentment that is the cause of parasitic and destructive behavior toward the host tribe. Sympathy, and moving them along to another area of living, ameliorates this condition.
The correct strategy with any internationalist group is to recognize that they do not belong in any national population, and to exclude them from cultural and economic life. In this way they will peacefully resettle in their political homelands.
Religion
Two courses can be seen to the process of religion, whose goal is to give meaning to life despite personal mortality. The first can be seen in Asia, where a nullity toward personal suffering and death is dominant, and the second in Israel, where a supernatural reality is imposed over natural, physical reality.
Indo-Europeans have taken a middle path. While they recognize higher value, it is seen as existing in this world and its ongoing life, and this value is held to be more important than the inevitable suffering and death which we all experience. We cannot stop death or suffering, so make them meaningful.
This viewpoint requires looking at life as a process and not as material things, or supernatural symbols. Natural things are a means to a cascade of outcomes, from which we derive meaning. This meaning is our end goal, and it is continuous as is the process of life, thus integral reality supports both nature and the shaping of it through heroism.
Despite a modern technological tendency to subdivide systems of thought by function, religion is found in all things, as it is part of the continuous process of thought. Art, philosophy, music, and politics all reflect the ideas we use to impose our values upon the world. Assuming that they exist independently, or without being motivated by ideological thought, is an error.
Negroes
Clearly every race is different, and has different abilities, regardless of what highly-politicized recent trends in genetics claim. The nascent science of genetics has made many errors, most commonly in assuming a false definition of "race" and thus loudly "debunking" it with dubious science, given the lack of certainty in the discipline.
However, it is not important whether Negroes are less intelligent, more violent, more prone to venereal disease or self-destructive behavior. The quest of nationalism is that each group have its own space, and not be dominated by others, or mixed with others, which amounts to the same thing (assimilation).
For this reason, it is imperative that Indo-Europeans be excluded from Africa, and that their own society without bitterness or resentment isolate itself from all other ethnic groups. Hatred is meaningless, and denies those who are worthy of respect among African populations.
Depopulation
"What to do, when a ship carrying a hundred passengers suddenly capsizes and there is only one lifeboat? When the lifeboat is full, those who hate life will try to load it with more people and as a result, will sink it. Those who love and respect life will take the ship's axe and sever the extra hands that cling to the sides of the boat." - Pentti Linkola
There are too many humans. A world of six billion leads to an exponentially increasing overpopulation of humans. Morality and socio-economic pressures do not currently allow for this to happen, but avoiding population control guarantees death not only for the human species but for its planet.
In this there is a conflict between heroism and moralism. Heroism would have us act for the highest goal, that of safety and continuity of all life, where moralism would have us save every human life equally and not consider the consequences to the whole.
For this reason, humanity must get past moralism. Population control can in this generation be achieved with selective sterilization and racial separation, which stops the dual population increase of immigration (it is an "escape valve" in the emigrant population, encouraging more breeding, and brings immigrant groups into wealthier societies where their traditional breeding practices result in higher survival rates, thanks to first world health care).
If fewer humans populate the earth and they are of a higher quality (matched intelligence, character and athleticism), both humanity and nature will be victorious.
Drugs
No society has an original taboo on drugs, except those substances which have proven to be so immediately addictive that they cause visible social degeneration (opiates). Our modern society, realizing that drugs offend our absolutist worldview by providing alternate ways to interpret our perceptual data, has lumped them together and banned them all.
Hallucinogens are the most offensive because they show us that the world exists as data, and our perception of it can be altered, revealing how un-absolute our vision of reality is. This upsets both the control mechanisms of industrial society, and the religious sensibilities of supernaturalists like Christians and Jews. Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam have not experienced these problems.
In the West, fear of drugs and the enforcement of their banning has produced the most repressive regime ever, in which a single phone call suggesting drugs exist at a location produces an immediate raid by machine-gun toting special intrusion units. Because we exist in a time where every life is equal, however, it is considered evil to suggest that we decrease this enforcement, as "jobs will be lost."
Taboo
Some behaviors are counterproductive to the degree that they are not tolerated, such as child pornography and incest. Others are "taboo," or are forbidden by social rules without a necessary corollary in natural reality. Those who cannot tell the difference are caught in the same paradox as those who protest fascism.
Most who find fascism offensive claim it limits "individual freedoms," but their belief runs into confusion when they are told that many would prefer fascism; it is their choice, and if they have freedom, cannot they have fascism? In this we see how absolutes such as "freedom" and "taboo" are constructed of emotion and not logic.
IV. Changes - Personal
V. Changes - Society
VI. Conclusion
Resources for further reading:
The Iliad
The Bhagavad-Gita
On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense
Collection by Pentti Linkola
The FC Manifesto by Ted Kaczynski
Nihilism by S.R. Prozak