Mail of the bag
11 03 13 - 04:57
From the bag of the mail:
Let's say you were not married. Would you fuck a cutie, attractive black girl whom you felt attracted to?
There's two questions here. Let me separate them out:
Would you fuck
No, I'd court, which is a gentle form of dating leading to potential marriage.
Dating is a waste of time, and fucking is for animals.
Dating encourages you to attempt pretend-marriage with someone and then at some point decide to use them as a long-term marriage partner, if it works for a number of years. The problem with this is that it breaks the contractual nature of marriage, and as such is always manipulative. With dating, there is no exchange of obligations; there is merely an existing condition that, while convenient, can be perpetuated. Marriage is entered into a a guilt-based obligation, which engenders long-term resentment.
Fucking seems like it would be great. It's fun, right? It's a half-hour of fun that's overemphasized in our society because media and social pressures force us to invent reasons that we're living the good life. We have to come up with the usual suspects: either we're fucking, or we're high, or we're drunk, or we're watching something, or we're eating something great. It's all instagram fodder. In reality, the most masculine among us don't spend much time fucking. They achieve things.
a cutie, attractive black girl whom you felt attracted to
I have known some ladies like this.
I would not court such a person, however, since in the uniformity of my observation the happy unions come from people who are of similar backgrounds. This ensures the greatest ability to understand one another and match one another in abilities, genetic inclinations and even genetics itself.
You could ask this question as well, "Would you court someone from another culture or social class?"
No, to someone from another culture -- having seen this up close, there are too many issues to resolve which can never be resolved. Fundamental assumptions are too radically different.
No, to someone from another social class, whether that would be richer or poorer, for the same reason.
27 comments
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Corrupt.org The Anis guy - 11-03-’13 06:42
pressure builds in our glands.... soon we will return to the glorious days of 2008 and the same passions that led le corrupt dot org! - 11-03-’13 09:20
>No, I'd court
Stopped reading there.
V
I
R
G
I
N so obvious - 11-03-’13 14:04
U
C
K
Y
O
U
dumb wigger! @ so obvious - 11-03-’13 15:50
>implying you won't be banging hot robot babes in a few years
http://www.sinfulrobot.com/ @ writer of article - 11-03-’13 20:06
Fun fact: humans are animals. JP - 11-03-’13 22:05
not being an irrelevant autist?
The point he's making is that there are more worthwhile alternatives to straight up fucking whose rejection makes sense only in the case of non-humans who can't aspire for more than orgasms. Is it really so unforgivable to use such a commonplace substitute as "animals" in place of "non-humans"? I don't see how this really needs to all be laid out for you. @JP - 12-03-’13 00:15
I never thought you'd be a faggot because Mastodon is so gay
But today, if you think that I didn't notice when you sat you suffered from anal pain,
You're insane, or you're a fool who hasn't paid attention to your own mind's decay
You have strayed, I can't help but be an asshole, I always knew that you liked Dave Mustaine
He's ok, but I never thought you'd be a faggot because Mastodon is so gay, hey
Mastodon is so gay, hey.
Mastodon is so gay, hey, hey.
Aaaah
So gay, anyway
You never thought you'd get the dick, just be cooler in a mainstream way
Now you've got AIDS, and you're on the streets each night sucking cocks for crack cocaine
You have strayed, I can't help but be an asshole, I always knew that you liked Dave Mustaine
He's ok, but I never thought you'd be a faggot because Mastodon is so gay, hey
Mastodon is so gay, hey.
Mastodon is so gay, hey, hey.
Ah ah ah ah, aaah, aaah, aaaah
Ah ah ah ah, aaah, aaah, aaaah
Ah ah ah ah, aaah, aaaaaaah http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYBHMaGVfTI - 12-03-’13 10:22
Atheism is the path of truth, but I fail to see how christianity's propensity to infect everything it can't destroy in a new environment somehow makes it intrinsic to that environment. You are also an idiot if you think radical Islam is significantly more a threat to humanity or western civilisation than evangelical 'christian conservatives'. The only threat to which Islamic terrorism presents to western nations, is the extent to which it provides a pretext to increase surveillance and executive powers for corrupt and inept governments, and the extent to which it can be used as justification for unwinable wars that weaken western nations by positioning their expensive technology dependent militaries where foreign extremists can wage effective guerilla warfare on them. @ Dominated Faggot - 13-03-’13 19:52
Your uncle's asking where the heck you left the anal lube bottle at... @ Dominated Faggot - 14-03-’13 14:39
Enjoy your AIDS. Thank God for AIDS - 16-03-’13 13:23
Quite right you are. But problem is for us English speakers is that women are so vapid and unwomanly. I'd rather spread my seed in continentals. Similar enough, but different enough to be more feminine and less empty. The true sweethearts in Angloland are to few to bother searching for.
Sweet comment section. Krampus - 07-04-’13 14:55