Anatomy of a tragedy
29 09 11 - 16:51
From the usual liars:
"Go home!" she yelled at me. "Why don't you go back home to Mexico before you ruin this country like you ruined your own!" - CNN
Aspect 1: The Hispanics, Asians, African-Americans and other non-Europeans were imported here as cheap labor and as a majority vote-breaker, much as the Irish, Greeks, Slavs, Italians and Jews were formerly imported. The proles and their unions, the big corporations, organized crime and land barons are all in agreement that this is good. The middle class dissents but can't stop itself (or the 3x as numerous lower classes) from buying the cheap products made by this labor.
Aspect 2: Mexicans didn't ruin their country. What ruined Mexico was a series of bad decisions, culminating in the choice to give field hands and maids the vote. These people don't know anything about politics. Most college-educated desk workers know nothing about politics; those who showed even less educational aptitude know even less, and since their own lives are squalid disasters, clearly lack the aptitude to make these decisions. As usual, political decisions made by an elite IN ORDER TO PANDER TO THE VAST MASSES OF UNDIFFERENTIATED PROLES brought down Mexico, as it brings down any nation.
Aspect 3: The Hispanic fellow who wrote this article believes in the "human rights" mantra of the United Nations. He thinks that if you're human, you can go anywhere at any time and do whatever you want to do. Another group of people felt this way: the Conquistadors. If we take this Hispanic fellow at his word, then it would be entirely legitimate to invade Mexico and enslave the population because that's how we roll.
It's like an ironic tragicomedy from Hell.
nine comments
RACIST ASS BULLSHIT!!!!
FUCK BRETT STEVENS TOO!!!! Adrian - 30-09-’11 11:11
In a healthy society-one full of strength-warfare and violence promote good things by keeping the population small and strng and courageous. This is why the old Greek city states would go out and fight small battles every summer (at certain points in their history) for no reason other than their belief in the benfits of war. In a decadent society, warfare usually indicates an animalistic impulse. If you are so full of hate that the only thing you fell like devoting your life to is dstruction, the problem is probably with you and your values, although as I said, not always.
I have never heard ANUS promote tolerance.
If a culture is conquering out of spiritual strength, then who are a bunch of decadent, modern, democrats like us to call them "unhumane?" If, on the other hand, they are a depraved peple who love nothing more than destruction for its own sake, they won't last long. If they do, its because the rest of humanity is weaker and more decadent than the conquerors. If thats the case, maybe humanity's time is up. Brian - 30-09-’11 15:42