A.N.U.S.

American Nihilist Underground Society

ANUS.COM: American Nihilist Underground Society (A.N.U.S.) at www.anus.com
RSS feed of ANUS.com opinions and news Mailing list:
Search anus.com:

Nihilism, Futurist Traditionalism and Conservationism

White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century, by Jared Taylor

12 05 11 - 19:48

Clarifying our position on race: there are no superior or inferior races. Nationalism, or one ethnic-racial group per nation forming an organic society which takes precedence over government and commerce, is the only way to have a stable civilization. Nationalism is simply superior to every other option. Mixed-race groups destroy all unique traits and, after one generation of hybrid vigor, end up losing millennia of evolutionary advantages in favor of a mediocre, low-IQ, cultureless, valueless gray race. Internationalism, or demanding that all humans become one race for the convenience of commerce and government, is the true enemy of diversity. We do not tolerate racism, including the type of racism that promotes internationalism. If you cannot understand the distinctions made in this paragraph, you are too stupid to discuss this issue and should go back to something for which you are suited. We recognize that standard leftist behavior (TLB) includes accusing anyone who is winning an argument refuting liberal points of racism, elitism, homophobia, sexism, etc. and recognize that those people are not sane. If you are expecting standard leftist dogma, or neo-Nazi dogma, the path ahead of you is nothing but disappointment; log off now.

Jared Taylor's latest is a masterpiece.

White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century explores racial identity in four groups: African-Americans, Asians, Hispanics and whites. Its conclusion is that each group wants segregation, and continued forced diversity/multiculturalism will reduce America to a third-world status nation.


Through meticulously researched content, Taylor proves that (a) diversity is failing despite massive government efforts (b) each racial or ethnic group seeks its own self-rule and identity, and in fact most prefer segregation (c) that racial identity is healthy for members of all ethnic groups and (d) that "diversity" and "multiculturalism" not only are failing now, but portend a future of continued failure that will harm all ethnic groups.

Sleek but not slick prose flows through this readable and engaging text, using numerous examples from both scientific publications and the mainstream news. Arguments are cleanly constructed and stand alone. It is an impressive work that will bring food for thought to anyone brave enough to consider the analysis it offers.



But that's not all!


From a nationalist viewpoint, one race or one ethny is one nation; the nation is not the government, or some lines drawn on a map, or even an economic or political dogma shared by the group. The nation is organic and it defines itself by heritage.

The IQ figures, crime reports, and ethno-political clashes are not the reason for nationalism. The reason for nationalism is, as in all conservative ideals, a pragmatic notion of “real life”: apart from our fancy institutions, and our invented dogmas, human life is a struggle for individuals to find moral clarity, and groups to find purpose.

Jared Taylor has written for years on The National Question, namely: how do we rediscover a national consciousness, and separate and segregate the white race in America so that it can experience self-rule once again? Unlike the odious White Nationalists, Taylor represents a hybrid between a classic liberal and a 1930s paleoconservative like H.L. Mencken. He is a practical thinker.

Unlike most “white nationalists,” Taylor takes a pragmatic view: the problem is not an inherent superior/inferior balance to humanity, but a combination of the need for identitarian politics and the rather radical differences between racial groups. Diversity itself is the culprit, he argues, because it’s a non-sensical feelgood message but not a functional groundwork for a civilization.


fifteen comments

dave
hail jared tailor dave - 12-05-’11 20:35
<span class='registered'>Svmmoned</span>
Everything is more or less correct, except for the first line. I know that there is no need at the moment to depreciate one race in favor of other - rather there's a need to force central idea of this article into mainstream. But from more philosophical stance it's hard to forget, that where you can find differences, there you can, based on some selected, desirable standard, set a hierarchy. Maybe overall verdict would be hard to achieve, but on particular fields it should be obvious. Svmmoned - 13-05-’11 10:54
Dave
"Mixed-race groups destroy all unique traits and, after one generation of hybrid vigor, end up losing millennia of evolutionary advantages in favor of a mediocre, low-IQ, cultureless, valueless gray race."

'Cause there's evidence that people have mixed race are more mediocre, low in IQ, and have inferior values, right? Somewhere? Anywhere? I thought not.

"Internationalism, or demanding that all humans become one race for the convenience of commerce and government,"

Yeah, that's not what it is. As far as I know, there have never been laws against breeding with people from one's own ethnic group, anywhere, ever.

"Its conclusion is that each group wants segregation,"

Groups don't want things, individuals do. Until you, and everyone writing about this, gets that, they can't understand the issue. A group can only achieve segregation at the expense of the freedom of the individuals.

"and continued forced diversity/multiculturalism will reduce America to a third-world status nation."

But forced monoculturalism will help? Dave (Email ) - 13-05-’11 16:24
Dave can't think
An individual can only achieve freedom at the expense of the group. Dave can't think - 13-05-’11 21:36
graveland
If you cannot understand the distinctions made in this paragraph, you are too stupid to discuss this issue and should go back to something for which you are suited. read that paragraph very carefully dave graveland (Email ) - 13-05-’11 22:18
nastrond
"An individual can only achieve freedom at the expense of the group."

By freedom do you mean political freedom or mental freedom/self-discipline?
If you're talking about political freedom, it depends on who you're emancipating. It's like Plato's Ring of Gyges, which makes the owner invisible; good people will carry on making sane judgments and actions and improving their nation with the added leverage if possible. The vulgar masses will of course dissociate, cheat, steal, murder, defecate and destroy.
Yet destruction has its time and place. :D http://www.fatalexception.org/spin_article/church.jpg

(That trick is probably as old as this site, but I'm keeping the FIRE BURNIIIIIING LOL GET IT!!) nastrond - 14-05-’11 01:31
WN is gay
At least Jared Taylor is better than that dead white nationalist asshole William Pierce. WN is gay - 14-05-’11 09:05
John D
People of mixed race are not necessarily inferior in any way to those of us who are racially unmixed. Forced racial mixing does not exist. If multiculturalism is failing us, this doesn't mean other races are the cause. John D (Email ) - 14-05-’11 19:21
Dave got saturated by Daves' mum multicultural shlong.
"But forced monoculturalism will help?"

Monoculturalism isn't forced. It is what all people naturally aspire to, unless.. They are vehemently told not to.
Governments invest great means to convince their populations to accept multiculturalism, that is to say, to accept something they normally wouldn't.
Though you can see that even with all their efforts, communities remain somewhat separated, and violence and racism exist, probing the failure of this ideology.

And to answer your question : Totally. monoculturalism 'helps' not to have third world countries.

Don't get me wrong : I accept multiculturalism as a personal experience. Just not when it becomes a directive for a whole society.
As an example, the 5 mandingo shlongs that you heartily welcome with your anus on a daily basis is a totally valid activity on a personal level, but not for everybody. Dave got saturated by Daves' mum multicultural shlong. - 15-05-’11 02:43
Yo Dawg we herd you like multiculturalism so we put giant black cocks in dave's anus so you can profit while you profit
... Yo Dawg we herd you like multiculturalism so we put giant black cocks in dave's anus so you can profit while you profit - 15-05-’11 02:47
Dave
"An individual can only achieve freedom at the expense of the group."

That assumes that groups have desires and interests independently from the individual. They don't. A group is simply a collection of individuals, and the interests of a group can only be defined with respect to its constituent individuals. So if one individual's freedom is curtailed, the whole group suffers.

"By freedom do you mean political freedom or mental freedom/self-discipline?"

I mean the freedom to make one's own choices, without unjust coercion by others. I think that's what you mean by political freedom. I'm not sure what you mean by mental freedom; self-discipline is simply one choice among many that people are free to make.

"If you’re talking about political freedom, it depends on who you’re emancipating."

People can of course forfeit their right to freedom, by unjustly imposing their will on others, i.e. crime. But until one does that, one's freedom should be respected. It's not enough that you just don't like them, or where they came from.

"Monoculturalism isn’t forced. It is what all people naturally aspire to, unless.. They are vehemently told not to."

That's just not true. Cultures, and races, have mixed freely for centuries, and it has always taken either natural barriers (islands, mountains, etc.) or incredible amounts of political force and beaurocracy (Nazi government, North Korea, etc.) to keep them apart.

"Governments invest great means to convince their populations to accept multiculturalism, that is to say, to accept something they normally wouldn’t."

See above; it takes a lot more means to convince them not to.

"Though you can see that even with all their efforts, communities remain somewhat separated, and violence and racism exist, probing the failure of this ideology."

Somewhat, yes. But violence exists outside of racism. And as for failure of ideology, separatist ideologies (Nazism again, etc.) have failed a lot harder.

"Totally. monoculturalism ‘helps’ not to have third world countries."

Example of that actually happening?

Third world countries were caused by colonialism. That's very different from multiculturalism.

"Just not when it becomes a directive for a whole society. "

Then you'll be happy to know that it's not. You're free to interact only with your own kind if you want. Just don't expect others to necessarily do the same. Dave (Email ) - 15-05-’11 11:27
IQ != Superiority
Besides the obvious fact that generally if your low IQ then you are more prone to stupid things, besides retards are inferior and besides no average guy can be the next Tesla. IQ is not a great measure of superiority.

I know a really smart high IQ person who is a self-absorbed asshole. Who only does things which benefit them and their "followers", who only seeks leadership positions to further gain power and exploit, and whoever dare question anything they says or contradict them are labeled stupid. In order to avoid being called stupid by this person you have to read the direct quote and statistic upon which point they suddenly change boats.

They are in everything for themselves, and yet have a high IQ. One of the types ANUS believes should be culled. A power hungry, natural exploiter of people.

And also Karl Marx probably had a high IQ yet we all know what we did.

It's high IQ + personal character that makes superiority. It's like if someone was physically fit but was piss poor athlete, you wouldn't want them on the team for the Olympics.

These sorts with high IQs furthering the philosophy of equality are more detrimental than any retard who can simply be aborted before birth. IQ != Superiority - 15-05-’11 13:09
BrutalBeats
SOULFLY 4 LIFE BITCHES!!!!!!!!! BrutalBeats - 15-05-’11 19:50
GO JARED TAYLor!!! YAY!!!!
Fuck yes!! GO JARED TAYLor!!! YAY!!!! - 22-05-’11 23:27
Dead Saxon
Yes on JT - Good practical thinking on this human plight. So when will we be ready for the good practical civil war in our great nation? Sooner or later lines will have to be drawn once this issue of nationalism reaches its collective point of intolerance. Any books on that? Dead Saxon - 23-05-’11 11:26


(optional field)
(optional field)

Remember personal info?
Small print: All html tags except <b> and <i> will be removed from your comment. You can make links by just typing the url or mail-address.