Jihad
19 03 11 - 08:19
From the mailbag:
do we really need to go to the level of jihad for making a point?
why cant i just live the way i enjoy, the way i enjoy watching some stupid channel? why should we be so concerned about how other people think and work...and in that context how is anarchism wrong if all we have to do is be self-righteous and do jihad.
Life is jihad. You either do the things that you know will bring good consequences, or you are acting as a force of stagnation, entropy, calcification and decay. Relevance is achieved by doing what makes sense and what makes life better. All actions have consequences; if not by direct physical response, by creation of patterns of similar events. You sit on your ass watching TV, and then others start to see that as acceptable, and soon you have an ass-sitting stupid-TV-watching culture. Your actions define your values. Your values are what other people emulate, either as positive means or as lowest common denominators.
Anarchism, liberalism, leftism, progressivism and other illlusory beliefs bring about bad consequences. They invoke good feelings, but don't care about the consequences beyond those feelings. As a result, they sew destruction and decay in their wake. To a nihilist, nothing has any meaning except its consequences on reality as known by its consistent natural laws of interaction. For that reason, anarchism/liberalism/etc are superfluous and as pointless as worship of dualistic deities.
thirteen comments

(ANUS readers appreciate the word "homophone") your buddy - 19-03-’11 11:40
And closet fags like Prozak... Adrian Mccoy - 21-03-’11 11:01
Nihilism is, as is uncontroversial, the 'clensing of the doors of perception'... the realisation that reality viewed through emotion/value judgements (which are essentially the same things) is 'appearance' and not 'thing-in-itself', because emotions stem from parts of the brain which evolved for survival in ancient hominid environments and not objective truth. The idea is to place more emphasis on a rational/dispassionate grasp of reality. But we cannot live without emotions/subjective cares, so the idea is to work for those subjective ends which our (slightly more objective) rationality identifies as not working against the laws of nature. In other words ethics becomes more 'rational' and less 'emotional.
However, and i hate to break it to all the teenagers and undergraduates around here, there are many different views about what is *rationally* ethical. Left wingers would say they are using their rational brains more than right-wingers. This philosophy stuff is cursory and ultimately masturbatory. If you wanna make change, go out an do battle, doing philosophy isn't going to change anything... Because people have different opinions about what is 'rational'. Sorry. david (Email ) - 23-03-’11 20:00
So all we have is wishful thinking, not that we cannot achieve an objective reality or the "thing in itself" but certainly we can try to emulate the objective perception trough subjective perception, using art for example.
Ok, no one cares about art and art doesn't give any money, thats because you suck.
Kill yourself.
Thanks,
~A poor artist. Noobzak - 24-03-’11 16:30