27 06 11 - 15:54From a notoriously fractious and insightful source, a rant that nails it -- on Facebook, of all places:
It's from "formula" in metal music that has either been the downfall or the up rise in the genre and among many of the bands. When bands set a distinct genre - and a set "formula" is established, once those bands begin the mix or change that formula, is when they take a risk of failing.
Sure some newer fans may take to the new formula - but those already established fans in the formula have a certain "taste" for what they prefer. Change the 'taste' - take the risk of having the already established fan base spitting it out after the first bite. Sure, some will attempt to stick around and nibble at the edges... attempting to find a similair taste and familiar feeling...
They will even attempt to make excuses, attempt to rationalize it, and even go as far as to use controversial behaviors or feelings in an attempt to explain in a rational or logical manner their intrepid points. They wish to avoid any true explanation of the utter disgust and disappointment they are truly feeling, and thus hide behind pitiful excuses and whitewashed ideals and values.
However, in my opinion - when a band decides to forsake the formula that works, and forsakes integrity in exchange to gain âa piece of breadâ (make $money) - I personally do not feel my loyalty is any longer of importance to the band. They have already decided that my personal opinion is no longer valid, and that other fans too that may share the same or similair opinions are also no longer important as well.
Integrity and pride more so than often get's washed away in favor of the notoriety and tempting promise of "fame and glory".
As well... with "formula" when a new genre is attempted to be made - by changing an already established genre, and trying to "mix" in something new to that genre. It is NOT likely to be accepted by those fans who already - as I said above - have an established taste for what the genre already has been dishing out.
Perfect example: DEATH-CORE is NOT DEATH METAL!
And as I said above -
some newer fans may take to the new formula - they will even attempt to make excuses, attempt to rationalize it...
even go as far as to pretend to accept is as inevitable change.
Translating into cause->effect logic:
Formula means repeating what others did.
However, that "what others did" is an effect, not a cause.
The cause of what they did was the need to translate an idea/mood into music.
The effect was how they did it.
You can't get the same effect by imitating their effect; instead, you must rediscover their cause.
But if your motive is fame/notoriety/kvltstatus/$$$ instead of "making art" (to translate that idea/mood into music), you will not understand that cause.
Metal is the spawn of early punk, progressive rock and horror film soundtracks -- it's more Anton Bruckner than Chuck Berry, more King Crimson than Blue Cheer, more Jethro Tull and Procul Harum than Led Zeppelin, and more Iggy Pop than The Beatles.
As a result, it takes integrity/authenticity seriously -- it is music of the Idea, and by that I do not mean dogma or the reality-detached idea, but an enmeshment with reality.
Like Romantic literature, it is born of a time in crisis... it is mixed-blood, with some blood being the feel-good prole average (rock) and some being the rising above (ambitious music->art).
Romantic literature had both Shelley and Blake, after all. Wordsworth and Keats; Coleridge and Bram Stoker (later Romantic literature sort of diverged into Gothic lit).
What does it mean?
When metal loses its honest intent to create art, and to translate an idea/mood into music, it becomes window-dressing: pandering to the crowd for popularity points.
And then, it becomes the same callow manipulation we're running away from, and that running away got us into metal.
Beware the rock-n-roll formula.